New Delhi. India needs a new civilian-military joint duty programme
to ensure that the government has a clear, long-term policy on the countrys
defence and strategic interests, and the armed forces work in that perspective
smoothly and effectively. Simply put, this means that officers from
the civilian side and the armed forces should complete at least one year of duty
in each others agencies or components to be promoted to the next higher
levels within their own spheres. There is a need amongst our civilian bureaucracy
and the military to soon implement a new human resources policy that should enhance
the careers of both the military professionals and the civilian officers. This
policy has to have the potential to transform the way we work together, and provide
information to the countrys security policymakers for informed decision
making. The programme could be similar to that set forth in the Goldwater-Nichols
Act of 1986 in the US, which mandated reforms in the US military. It was based
on the premise that the US armed forces would not be able to .ght and more
importantly win future wars as separate and distinct services. Rather,
the system would have to learn to fight jointly as a seamless, integrated
whole. The most powerful means of achieving that integration involved a
strategic human resource policy: The requirement that an officer serve in a joint,
multi-service combatant command in order to qualify for a flag rank. Today,
jointness is the second nature, and part of the militarys DNA. Jointness
is also a requirement for the shadow wars of the 21st century against terrorists. The
US learnt this lesson tragically on 11 Sep 2001, when its military, intelligence
and law enforcement agencies failed to connect the dots that could
have warned or given an indication at least of the horrific attacks. In
India, we have had our own share of shadow wars and proxy wars call them
whatever but we do not seem to have fully learnt appropriate lessons from
our own or others mistakes. Indeed, realizing how jointness had contributed
to a far more integrated and effective civil and military bureaucracy elsewhere,
a Group of Ministers Committee (GoMC) had created the Integrated Defence Staff
(IDS) in November 2001. It includes Service officers, civilian officers and scientists
interacting on policies and plans, operations, intelligence, international affairs
and net assessment. So how is this personnel policy going to help reform
our nations vast bureaucratic and military apparatus? Joint duty is
all about ensuring that out senior career leaders acquire a broad, enterprise-wide
focus; that is, deep understanding of how each agency and element of the setup
contributes to our overall mission. It is also about developing leaders
with an ability to integrate all of the assets human, technical and weapons
to accomplish that mission. In todays threat environment, our leaders
will need to build and leverage collaborative networks across the board and also
beyond, networks that can provide rapid information, intelligence insight, and
the ability to integrate and influence actions across organizational boundaries
for expediting meaningful decisionmaking. There are net-centric leadership
competencies, and you will not find them among the core qualifications list promulgated
by any of the offices of personnel management. However, it is believed that they
are essential to our mission, and they can be mastered only through joint duty.
Thus, joint duty becomes a key component of the civil-military leadership
development and succession strategy. For those personnel who aspire to be
senior leaders in their respective services, their career plans should now include
a one-to-three year tenancy to another agency, like the of.ces of the Ministries
of Defence, External Affairs, Finance, Home as well as intelligence bodies as
Officers on Special Duty (OSD). We need to maximize opportunities for personnel
who want to participate in this process. However, joint duty would not necessarily
guarantee a promotion as selection would still continue to be based on overall
merit. We believe that this is a matter of national security. When joint
duty is approved, there would be a need to set a very aggressive implementation
schedule. The goal is to have virtually all senior civilian and military
positions include joint duty as a mandatory quali.cation requirement. In doing
so, there is a need to strike a balance we do not want to put to disadvantage
any personnel by implementing it too rapidly. We do though need to set the mechanisms
in motion to build a more capable, collaborative and effective leadership corps. While
this is made even more challenging by the fact that the MoD has four major departments,
other ministries have not really interacted with the military. The programme should
enjoy the full support of each department and agency heads to make this work.
With the encouragement and support of the senior leadership, joint duty
will then be an integral part of becoming a civilian and military leader in the
national security apparatus. The author is Deputy
Chief of the Integrated Defence Staff (IDS). He delivered this lecture at the
First National Seminar on Aerospace Technologies (N-SAT) held by India Strategic
on Sep 25-26, 2008. |