"We have filed our report with the Supreme
Court last week. Only after that, we gave our
sanction to KNPP to go critical - commence the
fission process," Atomic Energy Regulatory
Board (AERB) chairman S.S. Bajaj told IANS over
phone from Mumbai July 11.
According to AERB's secretary R. Bhattacharya,
the report was filed with the apex court last
week
Queried about the alleged spurious signals from
the instrumentation cables due to electro-magnetic
interference, Bajaj said: "The plant has
been under our observation for several years.
The issues relating to cabling have been resolved
or else we would not have given our nod for KNPP's
first unit to go critical."
Asked when the first KNPP unit would go critical,
both AERB officials said it is for the plant operator,
the Nuclear Power Corporation of India Ltd (NPCIL),
to decide on that based on the clearances it has
obtained.
The NPCIL is setting up the project in Kudankulam
in Tirunelveli district, around 650 km from Chennai
in souther India, with two Russian-made reactors
of 1,000 MW each.
Bajaj said the reactor going critical does not
mean power will be generated.
"The unit will have to go in phases to generate
power and also to reach the maximum power,"
he said.
Bajaj said after the commencement of the fission,
the reactor will operate on low power and then
slowly increase the power output.
AERB had earlier granted the final permission
for initial fuel loading in September 2012.
KNPP director R.S. Sundar told IANS that the
plant may go critical this week or the next.
"We are reviewing the clearances. The reactor
may go critical this week or next week. We have
all the clearances from all the authorities,"
R.S. Sundar, site director, told IANS.
The KNPP is an outcome of the inter-governmental
agreement between India and the erstwhile Soviet
Union in 1988. However, construction began only
in 2001 but was delayed mainly due to non-sequential
supplies of components from Russian vendors.
Fearing for their safety in the wake of the nuclear
accident at Fukushima in Japan in 2011, villagers
in the vicinity of the Kudankulam plant, under
the banner of People's Movement Against Nuclear
Energy (PMANE) have been opposing the project.
City-based environmental activist G. Sundarrajan
had filed a case in the apex court demanding the
KNPP be scrapped. The court dismissed the case
in May and laid down 15 directions for the NPCIL,
the AERB, the union environment and forest ministry,
the Tamil Nadu government and the state pollution
control board to follow.
(IANS)
|